Pine Valley Christian Church, November 3, 2013, All Saints Sunday
Psalm 139, Rev. David Hansen
Escape From God
A sermon by Paul Tillich on Psalm 139
“Where could I go from Thy spirit and where could I flee from Thy face?” These are the central words of the great 139th Psalm. They state in the form of a question the inescapable Presence of God. Let us consider this statement, and the powerful images in which the psalmist tries to express it. God is inescapable. He is God only because He is inescapable. And only that which is inescapable is God.
There is no place to which we could flee from God which is outside of God. “If I ascend to the heavens, Thou art there.” It seems very natural for God to be in heaven, and very unnatural for us to wish to ascend to heaven in order to escape Him. But that is just what the idealists of all ages have tried to do. They have tried to leap towards the heaven of perfection and truth, of justice and peace, where God is not wanted. That heaven is a heaven of man’s making, without the driving restlessness of the Divine Spirit and without the judging presence of the Divine Face. But such a place is a “no place”; it is a “utopia”, an idealistic illusion. “If I make hell my home, behold, Thou art there. Hell or Sheol, the habitation of the dead, would seem to be the right place to hide from God. And that is where all those who long for death, in order to escape the Divine Demands, attempt to flee. I am convinced that there is not one amongst us who has not at some time desired to be liberated from the burden of his existence by stepping out of it. And I know that there are some amongst us for whom this longing is a daily temptation. But everyone knows in the depth of his heart that death would not provide an escape from the inner demand made upon him. “If I take the wings of the dawn and dwell in the midst of the sea, Thy Hand would even fall on me there, and Thy right Hand would grasp me.’ To fly to the ends of the earth would not be to escape from God. Our technical civilization attempts just that, in order to be liberated from the knowledge that it lacks a centre of life and meaning.
The modem way to flee from God is to rush ahead and ahead, as quickly as the beams before sunrise, to conquer more and more space in every direction, in every humanly possible way, to be always active, to be always planning, and to be always preparing.
But God’s Hand falls upon us; and it has fallen heavily and destructively upon our fleeing civilization; our flight proved to be vain. “When I think that the darkness shall cover me, that night shall hide me, I know at the same time that the darkness is not dark to Thee, and that night is as bright as day.” To flee into darkness in order to forget God is not to escape Him. For a time we may be able to hurl Him out of our consciousness, to reject Him, to refute Him, to argue convincingly for His non-existence, and to live very comfortably without Him. But ultimately we know that it is not He Whom we reject and forget, but that it is rather some distorted picture of Him. And we know that we can argue against Him, only because He impels us to attack Him. There is no escape from God through forgetfulness.
“Where could I go from Thy Spirit? 0, where could I flee from Thy Face?” The poet who wrote those words to describe the futile attempt of man to escape God certainly believed that man desires to escape God. He is not alone in his conviction. Men of all kinds, prophets and reformers, saints and atheists, believers and unbelievers, have the same experience. It is safe to say that a man who has never tried to flee God has never experienced the God Who is really God. When I speak of God, I do not refer to the many gods of our own making, the gods with whom we can live rather comfortably. For there is no reason to flee a god who is the perfect picture of everything that is good in man. Why try to escape from such a far-removed ideal? And there is no reason to flee from a god who is simply the universe, or the laws of nature, or the course of history. Why try to escape from a reality of which we are a part? There is no reason to flee from a god who is nothing more than a benevolent father, a father who guarantees our immortality and final happiness. Why try to escape from someone who serves us so well? No, those are not pictures of God, but rather of man, trying to make God in his own image and for his own comfort. They are the products of man s imagination and wishful thinking, justly denied by every honest atheist. A god whom we can easily bear, a god from whom we do not have to hide, a god whom we do not hate in moments, a god whose destruction we never desire, is not God at all, and has no reality.
Friedrich Nietzeche, the famous atheist and ardent enemy of religion and Christianity, knew more about the power of the idea of God than many faithful Christians. In a symbolic story, when Zarathustra, the prophet of a higher humanity, says to the Ugliest Man, the murderer of God, “You could not bear him to see you, always to see you through and through… . You took revenge on the witness. . . . You are the murderer of God.” The Ugliest Man agrees with Zarathustra and replies, “He had to die.” For God, according to the Ugliest Man, looks with eyes that see everything; He peers into man’s ground and depth, into his hidden shame and ugliness. The God Who sees everything, and man also, is the God Who has to die. Man cannot stand that such a Witness live.
Are we able to stand such a Witness? The psalmist says, “0 Lord, Thou hast searched me and known me.” Who can stand to be known so thoroughly even in the darkest corners of his soul? Who does not want to escape such a Witness? And who does not want to become one who can deny God in theory and practice, an atheist? “Thou knowest when I sit down, and when I stand up. .. Walking or resting, I am judged by Thee; and all my ways are open to Thee.” God knows what we are; and He knows what we do. Who does not hate a companion who is always present on every road and in every place of rest? Who does not want to break through the prison of such a perpetual companionship? “Thou discernest my thoughts from afar… Lord, there is not a word on my tongue which Thou knowest not.” The Divine Presence is spiritual. It penetrates the innermost parts of our own spirits. Our entire inner life, our thoughts and desires, our feelings and imaginations, are known to God. The final way of escape, the most intimate of all places, is held by God. That fact is the hardest of all to accept. The human resistance against such relentless observation can scarcely be broken. Every psychiatrist and confessor is familiar with the tremendous force of resistance in each personality against even trifling self-revelations. Nobody wants to be known, even when he realizes that his health and salvation depend upon such a knowledge. We do not even wish to be known by ourselves. We try to hide the depths of our souls from our own eyes. We refuse to be our own witness.
How then can we stand the mirror in which nothing can be hidden?
Is the Ugliest Man right? The Ugliest Man is a symbol of the ugliness in each one of us, and the symbol of our will to hide at least something from God and from ourselves. The Ugliest Man seems to be right, when we consider the support he receives from saints, theologians, and reformers. Martin Luther was as strongly grasped as the psalmist by the penetrating Presence of God. He stated that in every creature God is deeper, more internal, and more present than the creature is to himself, and that God embraces all things, is within all things. But this most intimate Presence of God created the same feeling in Luther that it did in Nietzsche. He desired that God not be God. “I did not love God. I hated the just God, and was indignant towards Him, if not in wicked revolt, at least in silent blasphemy.” Following St. Bernard, the great master of religious self- observation, he continued, “We cannot love God, and therefore we cannot will Him to exist. We cannot want Him to be most wise … and most powerful.” Luther was terribly shocked when he recognized this hatred for God within himself. He was not able to escape as shrewdly as his theological masters, who recommended that he not think constantly of the searching Presence of God, and thus avoid the blasphemy of hating God. Luther knew with the psalmist that no escape is possible. “Thou art behind and before me, and on every side of me, laying Thy Hand upon me.” God stands on each side of us, before and behind us. There is no way out.
The pious man of the Old Testament, the mystical saint of the Middle Ages, the reformer of the Christian Church, and the prophet of atheism are all united through that tremendous human experience: Man cannot stand the God Who is really God. Man tries to escape God, and hates Him, because he cannot escape Him.
The protest against God, the will that there be no God, and the flight to atheism are all genuine elements of profound religion. And only on the basis of these elements has religion meaning and power.
Christian theology and religious instruction speak of the Divine Omnipresence, which is the doctrine that God is everywhere, and of the Divine Omniscience, which is the doctrine that God knows everything. It is difficult to avoid such concepts in religious thought and education. But they are at least as dangerous as they are useful. They make us picture God as a thing with superhuman qualities, omnipresent like an electric power field, and omniscient like a superhuman brain. Such concepts as “Divine Omnipresence” and “Divine Omniscience” transform an overwhelming religious experience into an abstract, philosophical statement, which can be accepted and rejected, defined, redefined, and replaced. In making God an object besides other objects, the existence and nature of which are matters of argument, theology supports the escape to atheism. It encourages those who are interested in denying the threatening Witness of their existence. The first step to atheism is always a theology which drags God down to the level of doubtful things. The game of the atheist is then very easy. For he is perfectly justified in destroying such a phantom and all its ghostly qualities. And because the theoretical atheist is just in his destruction, the practical atheists (all of us) are willing to use his argument to support our own attempt to flee God.
Let us therefore forget these concepts, as concepts, and try to find their genuine meaning within our own experience. We all know that we cannot separate ourselves at any time from the world to which we belong. There is no ultimate privacy or final isolation. We are always held and comprehended by something that is greater than we are, that has a claim upon us, and that demands response from us. The most intimate motions within the depths of our souls are not completely our own. For they belong also to our friends, to mankind, to the universe, and to the Ground of all being, the aim of our life. Nothing can be hidden ultimately. It is always reflected in the mirror in which nothing can be concealed. Does anybody really believe that his most secret thoughts and desires are not manifest in the whole of being, or that the events within the darkness of his subconscious or in the isolation of his consciousness do not produce eternal repercussions? Does anybody really believe that he can escape from the responsibility for what he has done and thought in secret?
Omniscience means that our mystery is manifest. Omnipresence means that our privacy is public. The center of our whole being is involved in the center of all being; and the center of all being rests in the center of our being. I do not believe that any serious man can deny that experience, no matter how he may express it.
And if he has had the experience, he has also met something within him that makes him desire to escape the consequences of it. For man is not equal to his own experience; he attempts to forget it; and he knows that he cannot forget it.
Is there a release from that tension? Is it possible to overcome the hatred for God and the will that there be no God, that there be no man? Is there a way to triumph over our shame before the perpetual Witness and over the despair which is the burden of our inescapable responsibility? Nietzsche offers a solution which shows the utter impossibility of atheism. The Ugliest Man, the murderer of God, subjects himself to Zarathustra, because Zarathustra has recognized him, and looked into his depth with divine understanding. The murderer of God finds God in man. He has not succeeded in killing God at all. God has returned in Zarathustra, and in the new period of history which Zarathustra announces. God is always revived in something or somebody; He cannot be murdered. The story of every atheism is the same.
The psalmist offers another solution. “I praise Thee for the awful wonder of my birth;. Thy work is wonderful. For Thou didst form my being, and weave me together in my mother’s womb. None of my bones were hidden from Thee, when I was made in secret and molded in the lowest parts of the earth.” Using the old mythological idea that men are formed in the abyss below the earth, he points to the mystery of creation, not to the creation in general, but to the creation of his own being. The God Whom he cannot flee is the Ground of his being. And this being, his nature, soul, and body, is a work of infinite wisdom, awful and wonderful. The admiration of the Divine Wisdom overcomes the horror of the Divine Presence in this passage. It points to the friendly presence of an infinitely creative wisdom. It is this mood which runs generally throughout the Old Testament. A great scholar, with whom I conversed once on the will to death in every life, exhibited the same mood, when he said, “Let us not forget that life is also friendly.” There is a grace in life. Otherwise we could not live. The eyes of the Witness we cannot stand are also the eyes of One of infinite wisdom and supporting benevolence.
The center of being, in which our own center is involved, is the source of the gracious beauty which we encounter again and again in the stars and mountains, in flowers and animals, in children and mature personalities.
But there is something more to the psalmist’s solution. He does not simply consider the creative Ground of his being. He also looks to the creative destiny of his life. “Thine eyes saw the sum total of my days, and in Thy book they were all written. They were counted before they ever came into existence.” The psalmist uses another old mythical symbol, which is the record of earthly events in an heavenly book. He expresses poetically what we today call the belief in an ultimate meaning of our life. Our days are written and counted; they are not merely accidental. He Who sees us most intimately looks at the vision of our whole life. We belong to this whole; we have a place of the utmost importance within it. As individuals and as a group, we have an ultimate destiny. And whenever we sense this ultimate destiny, whether or not it appears as great or insignificant, we are aware of God, the Ground and center of all meaning. We can join in the psalmist’s cry of admiration: “How mysterious Thy Thoughts are to me, 0 God! How great the sum of them is! If I were to count them, they would outnumber the sands; and if I were to come to the end of them, the span of my life would be like Thine!” The psalmist thus conquers the horror of the all-reflecting mirror and of the never-sleeping Witness by his recognition of the infinite mystery of life, its Ground and its meaning.
But suddenly, at the climax of his meditation, the psalmist turns away from God. He remembers that there is a dark element in the picture of his life — enmity against God, wickedness, and bloody deeds. And since this element disturbs his picture, he asks God to eradicate it. In sudden rage, he shouts, “If Thou wouldst but slay the wicked, 0 God, and make the men of blood depart from me, who oppose Thee in their thoughts, and utter Thy name in their crimes! Should I not hate them that hate Thee, 0 Lord? Should I not despise them? I hate them with the deadliest hatred. They are also my enemies!” These words should disturb anyone who thinks that the problem of life can be solved by meditation and religious elevation. Their mood is quite different from that of the previous words. Praise turns into curse. And the trembling of the heart before the all-observing God is replaced by wrath towards men. This wrath makes the psalmist feel that he is equal with God, the God from Whom he wished to flee into darkness and death. God must hate those whom he hates; and God’s enemies must be his enemies. He has just spoken of the infinite distance between his thoughts and God’s Thoughts; but he has forgotten. Religious fanaticism appears, that fanaticism which has inflamed the arrogance of Churches, the cruelty of the moralists, and the inflexibility of the orthodox.
The sin of religion appears in one of the greatest Psalms.
It is that sin which has distorted the history of the Church and the vision of Christianity, and which was not fully avoided even by Paul and John. Of course, we whose religious experience is poor and whose feeling of God is weak should not judge too harshly those whose lives burned with the fire of the Divine Presence and spread this fire ardently all over the world. Nevertheless, the sin of religion is real; and it contradicts the Spirit of Him, Who forbade His disciples again and again to hate His enemies as the enemies of God.
Yet, a change of thought and feeling brings the psalmist suddenly back to the beginning of his poem. He feels quite obviously that something may have been wrong in what he has uttered. He does not know what is wrong; but he is certain that God knows. And so he concludes with one of the greatest prayers of all time:
“Search me, 0 God, and know my heart. Try me and know my thoughts. And see if there be any false way in me; and lead me the perfect way.” At this moment he asks God to do what, according to the first words of the Psalm, he does relentlessly anyway. The psalmist has overcome his wavering between the will to flee God and the will to be equal with God. He has found that the final solution lies in the fact that the Presence of the Witness, the Presence of the centre of all life within the centre of his life, implies both a radical attack on his existence, and the ultimate meaning of his existence. We are known in a depth of darkness through which we ourselves do not even dare to look. And at the same time, we are seen in a height of a fullness which surpasses our highest vision. That infinite tension is the atmosphere in which religion lives. In that tension Luther conquered his hatred for God, when he discovered in Christ the Crucified the perfect symbol for our human situation. It is the tension in which modern man lives, even though he may have lost the way to traditional religion. A human being can be ultimately judged by whether or not he has reached and can stand that tension. To endure it is more horrible and more difficult than anything else in the world. And yet, to endure it is the only way by which we can attain to the ultimate meaning, joy, and freedom in our lives. Each of us is called to endure. May each of us have the strength and the courage to bear that vocation! For it is to that vocation that we are called as men.
——————————————————
Paul Tillich is generally considered one of the twentieth century’s outstanding and influential thinkers. After teaching theology and philosophy at various German universities, he came to the United States in 1933. For many years he was Professor of Philosophical Theology at Union Theological Seminary in New York City, then University Professor at Harvard University. His books include “Systematic Theology;” “The Courage to Be;” “Dynamics of Faith;” “Love, Power and Justice;” “Morality and Beyond;” and “Theology of Culture.” “Escape From God” appears in a collection of Tillich’s sermons, “The Shaking of the Foundations” was published by Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, in 1955 and is now in the public domain.
I want to thank Dean Hall and the Cathedral staff for their celebration of this Children’s Sabbath and all of you for being here, and I also want to thank the Children’s Defense Fund staff that worked so hard to make it possible and the D.C. Mayor and Police Department for helping us have a symbolic turning of swords into plowshares and RAWtools who is here today, our Blacksmiths, and I hope you will join us right after church.
What kind of people do we Americans want to be? What kind of people do we want our children to be? What kind of choices and sacrifices are we prepared to make to realize a more just, compassionate, and less violent society and world, one safe and fit for every child?
O God, help us never to confuse what is quite legal, with what is just and right in your sight. Amen.
A thousand years ago, the United States was not even a dream. Copernicus and Galileo had not told us the Earth was round or that it revolved around the Sun. Gutenberg’s Bible had not been printed. Wycliffe had not translated it into English, and Martin Luther had not tacked his 95 Theses on the church door. The Magna Carta did not exist. Chaucer’s and Shakespeare’s tales had not been spun, and the miraculous music of Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, and the Negro slaves in America had not been created to inspire and sooth our spirits. Many European serfs struggled in bondage, while many African and Asian empires flourished in independence. Native Americans peopled America’s soil free of slavery’s blight, and Hitler’s Holocaust had yet to show the depths human evil can reach when good women and men remain silent or indifferent or give up too early because the problem is hard.
A hundred or a thousand years from now, will civilization and humankind remain? Will America’s Dream be alive, be remembered, and be worth remembering? Will the United States be a blip or a beacon in history? Can our founding principle that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights withstand the test of time, the tempest of politics and greed, and become deed and not just creed for every man, woman, and child? Can we overcome our lingering birth defects from slavery, Native American genocide, violent both of them, exclusion of women from and propertied white men from democracy, and close that gap between our dream and our deed? Is America’s Dream big enough for every second child who is female, every fourth child who is Latino, every fifth child who is poor, every seventh child who is black, and every 12th child who is mentally or physically challenged?
Something is awry in our country when the United States—in this United States when the 400 highest-earning taxpayers earned as much as the combined tax revenues of 20 states in 2009, and our wealth and income and educational inequality are at near-record levels. How do we close this spiraling gap between the haves and the have-nots? What kind of country does it reflect to have a gross domestic product which leads the industrialized world, indeed is number one in millionaires and billionaires, but 34th in the percent of children living in poverty, which is also a form of a violence, and 31st in preventing infant mortality? How do we continue to tolerate being number one with the largest number of incarcerated people in the world and with a prison pipeline that is fed by one in three black boys going in 2001 and one in six Latino boys? How do they become the people that we need them to be, and why do we continue to let this drive that has settled at the interaction of poverty and race continue to chisel away in our efforts to become a society where everybody is equally valued and there is a level playing field for us all?
We have got to see the continuing problems erase and poverty in our nation, the structural problems and the cultural problems, and see how we are going to end this blight, because otherwise we are going to have a new American apartheid reflected in our incarceration and prison system, and it’s going to set us back 50 years in our efforts for social and economic progress. How do people of faith wake up and see and act to make us come together rather than to continue the process that we are hearing in our culture too much now that separates us, one from the other?
After President Kennedy’s assassination, Dr. King wrote that it was time for our nation to do some soul-searching, and he said, “While the question of ‘Who killed President Kennedy?’ was important, the question of ‘What killed President Kennedy?’” was even more critical. Dr. King believed the answer was that our late President was assassinated by a morally inclement nation climate. :It is a climate filled with heavy torrents of false accusation, jostling winds of hatred, and raging storms of violence. It is a climate where men cannot disagree without being disagreeable, and where they express dissent through violence and murder. It is the same climate that murdered Medgar Evers in Mississippi and six innocent Negro children in Birmingham, Alabama,” he said 50 years ago this year.
Dr. King also said that the undercurrents of hatred and violence was made up in this morally inclement climate, which made this morally inclement climate, were fueled by our cultural embrace of guns. “By our readiness,” he said, “to allow arms to be purchased at will and fired at whim, by allowing our movie and television screens to teach our children that the hero is one who masters the art of shooting and the techniques of killing, by allowing all of these developments, we have created an atmosphere in which violence and hatred have become popular pastimes.” The same winds of hatred, storms of violence, and easy access to and glorification of guns that Dr. King believed killed President Kennedy would soon also kill Dr. King.
On April 5th, 1968, in Cleveland, Ohio, after Dr. King’s assassination, Robert Kennedy spoke about the mindless menace of violence in America, which again stains our land and every one of our lives. “It is not,” he said, “the concern of any one race. The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old, famous and unknown.” “No one,” Kennedy said, “no matter where he lives or what he does can be certain who will suffer from some senseless action of bloodshed. And yet it goes on and on and on in this country of ours.”
Since Robert Kennedy spoke these words, he and another 1,300,000 other American men, women, and children have been killed by guns. This is twice the loss of life than all American battle casualties and all of the major wars we have fought since our nation began. Guns have lethalized our despair and anger and turned moments of emotional instability into tragic, permanent loss of lives, and while the heartbreaking massacre in Newtown and Aurora and our inner cities daily go on—and the Navy Yard—it may galvanize public attention for a moment or a week or even a month. Killing of children, particularly by gun violence, is not new. It has been a relentlessly unreported and underreported plague that kills or injures a child every half hour in our nation.
Since 1963, guns have killed over 166,000 children, three times more child deaths on American soil than all the combat of soldiers in wars abroad. What is it going to take for us to see and to hear and to stand up to stop the killing of children? Why are American children, under 15 years of age, 17 times more likely to die from gunfire than their peers in 25 other industrialized countries? And not even our youngest children are exempt from this gun scourge. We lose more preschool children every year to gun violence than police officers in the line of duty. Why do we tolerate this? I can’t imagine what God must think.
Escalating violence against and by our children and youth is no coincidence. It is a cumulative, convergent, and heightened manifestation of a range of serious and too-long denied and neglected problems, including epidemic, including epidemic child and family poverty, racial intolerance and hate crimes, an inadequate mental health system, rampant drug and alcohol abuse, pervasive violence in our homes and popular culture, the disintegration of too many of our families and communities and the spiritual values that support children need to be supportive, neglected children and youths left to fend for themselves by too many absentee parents in all race and income groups, and continuing abuse and neglect of children in their own homes. A child is abused or neglected every 45 seconds—47 seconds, the CDF staff would correct me.
This is all fueled and exacerbated by equal and easy access to deadlier and deadlier firearms and exacerbated by political leadership in all parties and in all levels of government that pays more attention to farm than to domestic enemies, to the rich than to the poor, and to their own political interest than to the interest of children and families in our community and our nation, and to too much silence on the part of people of faith and citizens to demand that they speak up and take actions to keep our children safe and to stop the proliferation of guns.
The U.S. has more guns as people and as citizens than our law enforcement agencies. About eight times, in fact, more guns are in the hands of citizens than there are in the hands of our law enforcement. Something is wrong with that picture, and many of these guns, like AK-47s, are the assault weapons which we should forge a responsible ban on, have nothing to do with hunting and self-protection. And as we heard, the market is if you need a gun in your house to keep your family safe—from the wonderful forum with our leading public health experts this morning—if you have a gun in your home, you’re more likely to be less safe than to be safe, and I hope that all of us will look at and think about this forum that was livestreamed, and we need to begin to confront gun violence as a public health issue that we can solve and must solve with urgency and persistence, and we must begin to make sure that we know the truth. And we must stop then NRA’s blockade on gun research.
What can we do? We can, one, follow the example of the relentlessly persistent widow in Luke, that despite the unjust judge who didn’t care anything about her call for justice, she wore him down, and it was easier for the unjust judge to do what she wanted, than not to do what she wanted, and we must be like that widow with our Congress people and our state legislators and all those who block the truth through research and who really insist on making more and more powerful weapons available. We can stop this scourge of violence with our own dogged persistence. Slavery was hard to overcome. A lot of things that we overcame were hard, but we’ve seen transformational movements come about, and good people decide that it is time to do something and to stand up. And we need as people of faith and as parents and as citizens to stand up to our political leaders, and as citizens, it is we who will start this movement. They don’t happen in Washington; they happen back home. So call and e-mail and be vigilant witnesses, and make sure that we are now going to end until we have universal background checks, that we do have a support of ban on assault weapons and high-ammunition clips, that we do begin to make sure that our children have mental health services, that the Consumer Productive Safety Commission can regulate guns. It is the only unregulated consumer product, and it kills 30,000 people a year. We regulate toy guns and teddy bears, and we don’t regulate guns that kill thousands each year? Let’s turn that policy around, and let’s take the actions that we can take to provide alternatives to the streets for our children. Our congregations need to open up their doors and provide positive alternatives for the streets and be a source of comfort and safety for young people. The gangs and the drug dealers and the gun dealers are open 24 hours and 7 days a week. How do we compete with them in the faith community, and how do we get people in the faith community to go out into their neighborhoods, so that they know that there’s hope and that they are not alone, that they do not have to resort to guns to protect themselves? We can do this if we choose to do it.
The second thing we really must do is to confront the continuing scourge of poverty, which Dr. King thought was another form of extreme violence. It is a travesty that children are the poorest age group in America, and that the younger they are, the poorer they are. And we’ve got the incentive of our Congress cutting food in a time of recession and a jobless recovery, when increasing numbers of children and families are becoming hungry, and millions of Americans have no income. And we’ve not touched all the corporate welfare subsidies, all the subsidies for the wealthy. What kind of nation hits children who are cold and hungry at a time of need? We need to come to grips with who we are and what we want to be as a people.
And one thing I hope we will try to agree to accomplish in beginning to end child poverty and to set a goal for ending child poverty, and that is putting into place a high-quality early childhood system for every child to get them ready for school. Sixty percent of all American children cannot read or compute at grade level in almost 79 percent of Latino children, and 80 percent of black children cannot read or compute at grade level. What is a child going to do in this society, in this competitive, globalizing world if they can’t read or compute? They are being sentenced to a social and economic death. We can do better than that, and the foundation that we must lay is through early childhood development. And the President has proposed—and we have got to get all of our Members of Congress and all of our legislators out in the States that we invest $90 billion, which is a very strong start, in ensuring home visiting, are really putting into place the early care and early childhood development to make every child ready for school, home visiting, Head Start, quality Early Head Start, preschool education, and I would submit kindergarten as well, universal, because we are going to require that our children meet Common Core standards very shortly, but only 10 states provide full-day universal kindergarten. You must stop holding children accountable for things that we don’t give them the supports and the means to achieve. We could do this. This is probably the most important poverty prevention effort that we could take, and with all of our voices, I hope we can achieve bipartisan support that we are going to get every American child ready for school and give those children an alternative to the prison pipeline and have them grow up to be productive citizens in this very rich nation.
Our states are spending on average three times more for prisoner than for public school pupil. That’s about the dumbest investment policy we could have. We must reverse it, and we can begin to invest, as Chairman Bernanke said, in early childhood, which is one of the best economic investments we can make, but it would give our children a chance to participate in our democracy and in our country and to contribute. I would think that we would be able to do that.
Let me just end with a prayer to ask God to give and help us transform our rich and powerful nation, where small babies die of cold quite legally. O God, help us to prevent and transform our nation where small children suffer from hunger quite legally. O God, forgive and help us transform our rich and powerful nation where toddlers and school children die from guns sold quite illegally and often illegally. O God, forgive us, and help us transform our rich and powerful nation that lets children be the poorest group of citizens quite legally. O God, forgive and help us transform our rich nation that lets the rich continue to get more at the expense of the poor quite legally. O God, forgive and help us transform our rich and powerful nation which thinks security rests in missiles and bombs rather than in mothers and in babies. O God, forgive and help us transform our rich nation, for not giving you sufficient thanks, by giving to others their daily bread. O God, help us never to confuse what is quite legal, with what is just and right in your sight. Amen.